[vc_row el_id=”post”][vc_column width=”2/3″ el_class=”sideLeftPost”][vc_raw_html el_id=”postImgDestaque”]JTNDZGl2JTIwY2xhc3MlM0QlMjJpbnNlcnRJbnNpZGUlMjIlM0UlM0MlMkZkaXYlM0U=[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]The Research Group on Administrative Impropriety at IDP held a debate on May 04th at the institution's headquarters, with the presence of the group's coordinator, Professor Rafael Araripe Carneiro, the Minister of the Superior Court of Justice, Napoleão Nunes Maia Filho, and the Legal Consultant of the National Confederation of Municipalities (CNM), Dr. Joanni Henrichs.
Professor Rafael Araripe Carneiro opened the event by presenting the group's objective of consolidating empirical data on administrative misconduct cases. The professor highlighted that Law No. 8.429/92 is an important tool in combating serious practices against the Public Administration, but that in recent years there has been increasing criticism regarding the excessive use of administrative misconduct lawsuits against formal errors or minor irregularities. Therefore, the professor emphasized the need to gather objective evidence on administrative misconduct, whose significant impact in the electoral sphere reinforces its importance.
Next, Joanni Henrichs, Legal Consultant at CNM, presented the partial results of the research developed from the questions formulated by the IDP group. Preliminary data indicates that the largest number of corruption lawsuits against mayors involve the principles of public administration (46,5%), while cases of illicit enrichment represent only 8,8%. The preliminary research also points out that 21,6% of corruption lawsuits against mayors involve less than R$10 and 22% are in the range between R$10 and R$50. The research also indicates that 42% of the cases that reached the Superior Courts had their judgments modified and that 72% of the mayors interviewed affirm that corruption lawsuits have a high or medium impact on the implementation of municipal public policies.
Minister Napoleão Nunes Maia Filho congratulated the group on their choice of topic, which is current and controversial, and highlighted the need to obtain empirical data to understand the current state of administrative misconduct. The Minister also presented rulings from the First Section of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) which, in his opinion, indicate a distortion of the concept of misconduct, which should only be used to repress acts of dishonesty and bad faith.
Those interested in participating in the group should write to the following email: parca.tulio@gmail.com .[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″ el_class=”sideRightPost”][vc_widget_sidebar sidebar_id=”sidebar”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” equal_height=”yes” el_id=”courses-page-box-5″ css=”.vc_custom_1526064800224{margin-top: 0px !important;margin-bottom: 0px !important;background-image: url(http://homologacao.idp.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/bn_contato_idp-1980×300-1.jpg?id=5274) !important;background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: cover !important;}” el_class=”postCTA”][vc_column][themeum_action alignment=”left” title=”STILL HAVE QUESTIONS?” title_style=”customstyle” title_heading=”h2″ title_size=”20″ title_color=”#ffffff” title_weight=”800″ title_margin=”53px 0 0″ title_padding=”0″ btn_position=”btnright” btntext=”CONTACT US” btnurl=”/contact/” btntype=”white” btnsize=”btn-lg”][/vc_column][/vc_row]
